In its own words on X: "Supercharge your AI agents with data from the web and beyond. Building the library for superintelligence. 🔥" Firecrawl posted the Webhooks for /agent launch from @firecrawl on Jan 9, 2026.

How many views did Firecrawl Webhooks for /agent get on X?

7,349 views. Firecrawl posted it from @firecrawl on Jan 9, 2026, and the post has 82 likes, 8 reposts, 0 quotes, 24 replies and 41 bookmarks. Gridd re-reads these numbers from the post every six hours; these were read on Nov 14, 2026.

Was Firecrawl Webhooks for /agent a big launch on X?

It ranks #3722 of the 3,785 launches Gridd tracks, with more views than 2% of them and 6% of the median launch's 119.4K views. Its engagement rate is 1.55%, against a median of 0.58%.

How did Firecrawl Webhooks for /agent do on X?

Q: What would 7.3K views on X cost to buy?

At $100 per 1,000 views, the rate a brand pays an agency charging $100K for one million views, 7.3K views would cost $1K. Gridd guarantees one million views, 136x what this post got, for about $25K.

Firecrawl posted the Webhooks for /agent launch from @firecrawl on Jan 9, 2026. The post has 7,349 views, 82 likes, 8 reposts, 0 quotes and 24 replies, an engagement rate of 1.55%. It ranks #3722 of the 3,785 launches Gridd tracks.

Firecrawl@firecrawl · 101.7K followersView on X

We just shipped Webhooks for /agent 🚀 Subscribe to agent events and get notified after every scrape, search, completion, or failure. You can even track credit usage as it runs. Check out the docs 👇

Jan 9, 2026 · 7,349 views

6%the median launch119.4K median views
#3722of the launches we trackout of 3,785
<0.1xits own following101,720 followers

Views: 7.3K
Likes: 82
Reposts: 8
Quotes: 0
Replies: 24
Bookmarks: 41

What would these views cost to buy?

At $100 per 1,000 views, the rate a brand pays an agency charging $100K for one million views, 7.3K views would cost $1K. Gridd guarantees one million views, 136x what this post got, for about $25K.

The post reached about 0.1 views for every follower of @firecrawl.

What launched?

Firecrawl shipped Webhooks for /agent, letting users subscribe to agent events and get notified after every scrape, search, completion or failure, and track credit usage.

How does it compare with other launches?

Firecrawl Webhooks for /agent has more views than 2% of the 3,785 launches Gridd tracks: 6% of the median launch's 119.4K views.

Firecrawl Webhooks for /agent7.3K
Median tracked launch119.4K
#1: xAI Voice Cloning204M

Views on the launch post, read from X on Nov 14, 2026.

Metric	Firecrawl Webhooks for /agent	Median launch
Views	7.3K	119.4K
Engagement rate	1.55%	0.58%
Views per follower	<0.1	1.5
Quote posts	0	20
Saves per 10K views	55.8	15.0

Other Firecrawl launches we track: Firecrawl Fire-PDF (891.9K views), Firecrawl /agent (613.9K views), Firecrawl Government & Legal Index (450.6K views), Firecrawl People Data (378.4K views), Firecrawl CLI (357.5K views), Firecrawl anydoc (322.4K views). All 100 Firecrawl launches, or every developer tools launch.

Against launches like it

A launch only means something against comparable ones. These are the groups it belongs to, and where it sits in each.

Compared with	Launches	Median views	This one	Rank
Developer tools launches	815	69.1K	11%	#798
Accounts 100K to 1M followers	1,516	113.9K	6%	#1500
Video launch posts	2,470	144.7K	5%	#2436
Every launch	3,785	119.4K	6%	#3722

What this launch shows

From an account with 101.7K followers, the post reached <0.1 times the account's following. Launches from accounts 100K to 1M followers reach a median of 0.5 times their following, so this one went about 14% as far as usual for its size. It ranks 1500 of 1516 launches from accounts that size.

It drew 0 quote posts, 0.0 per 10,000 views against a median of 1.7. Fewer people than usual added their own take, and a quote post is what carries a launch to audiences the account does not have.

The first line is "We just shipped Webhooks for /agent 🚀". The post runs 35 words, against a median of 38 for launch posts here, and leads with a video: video launches have a median of 144.7K views, against 77.9K for the rest.

There is no link in the post. Launch posts without a link have a median of 127.4K views in the tracker.

It went out on a Friday (UTC). Friday launches have a median of 101.1K views; the strongest day is Tuesday at 137.9K.

Every comparison is against the 3,785 launches in the tracker, read on Nov 14, 2026. Medians, not averages. See the state of launches on X for the full breakdown.

Questions about this launch

What is Firecrawl?: In its own words on X: "Supercharge your AI agents with data from the web and beyond. Building the library for superintelligence. 🔥" Firecrawl posted the Webhooks for /agent launch from @firecrawl on Jan 9, 2026.
How many views did Firecrawl Webhooks for /agent get on X?: 7,349 views. Firecrawl posted it from @firecrawl on Jan 9, 2026, and the post has 82 likes, 8 reposts, 0 quotes, 24 replies and 41 bookmarks. Gridd re-reads these numbers from the post every six hours; these were read on Nov 14, 2026.
Was Firecrawl Webhooks for /agent a big launch on X?: It ranks #3722 of the 3,785 launches Gridd tracks, with more views than 2% of them and 6% of the median launch's 119.4K views. Its engagement rate is 1.55%, against a median of 0.58%.
What would 7.3K views on X cost to buy?: At $100 per 1,000 views, the rate a brand pays an agency charging $100K for one million views, 7.3K views would cost $1K. Gridd guarantees one million views, 136x what this post got, for about $25K.

Source: Gridd launch tracker, gridd.agency/launches/firecrawl-webhooks-for-agent, read from the post on X on Nov 14, 2026. Free to cite with a link (CC BY 4.0). Get every launch as JSON.